|
TRAINING IN BIODIVERSITY MONITORING FOR PROTECTED AREAS STAFF
One of the key roles of NACRES is to assist Georgia’s protected areas in
building their capacities. The majority of NACRES projects have been directly
related to the improvement of the Protective Areas management and their
effectiveness as a major tool for biodiversity conservation. One way of
strengthening any protected area is to increase the skill level and
qualifications of its staff members. NACRES won a tender announced with the GEF/World
Bank funded Georgia Protected Areas Project for providing training to the staff
of Vashlovani, Lagodekhi, Batsara-Babaneuri and Tusheti protected areas; this
project also involved training sessions in biodiversity monitoring for relevant
staff members of the Protected Areas Department. The assignment started in May
2006 and will be completed in June 2007.
In 2006, within the terms of the above-mentioned assignment, NACRES team
members conducted training sessions for the staff of Vashlovani, Lagodekhi,
Batsara-Babaneuri and Tusheti protected areas. The training was targeted to
gathering field data as necessary for effective biodiversity monitoring. Later,
in 2007, a comprehensive biodiversity monitoring handbook and a field guide is
to be published and this educational material will be especially designed for
these and other Georgian protected areas. Moreover, a general residential
training will be organised for biodiversity monitoring planning and
implementation, including field data analysis. The training will last 10 days
attended by appropriate staff members representing all of the Georgian protected
areas i.e. resource management specialists or research & monitoring specialists,
heads of rangers services, as well as employees representing the Department of
Protected Areas.
Field training sessions on the target protected areas were planned taking
into account that (i) most (if not all) members of the target protected areas
lacked any experience of field data collection for biodiversity monitoring -
many rangers had in fact been just recently recruited, (ii) field trainings
would not have caused any delays or interference in normal functioning of the
protected area and (iii) the groups should not have been too large in order to
ensure best results and create the possibility of providing an effective
learning environment and working on an individual level.
The following general guidelines were elaborated and applied by the trainers
in planning and implementation of field training sessions on each of the target
protected areas:
- Divide rangers in training groups and design a schedule together with the
senior park management
- Keep record of participant attendance to make sure that each participant
attends every component of the training (this will allow for some greater
flexibility for rangers – anybody unable to attend a particular component with
his own group would have a second chance to join in another group on a
different day in order to catch up on the material covered)
- Each new component of the field training began with a brief theoretical
introduction and overview
- Field activities last as long as needed for effective learning outcomes
but still it depends on the time made available to the participants by the
park management
- The following day of each session begins with the review of already
discussed components (and this allows opportunities for additional
explanations, or to even repeat a practical sessions, if needed).
Field training was dedicated to the following topics:
- What is biodiversity monitoring and why it is needed for protected areas?
- General aspects of field data collection in biodiversity monitoring
- Data collection for large mammals:
- Direct (visual) observations
- Footprint identification
- Use of remote sensing cameras (photo-trapping)
- Data collection on plant species and plant communities (depending on
season)
- Use of GPS
- Use of maps
- Any other issue or question that may arise from the participants, with the
exception of those falling into the scope of the theoretical training (not
practical)
Despite the fact that each of the target protected areas possessed GPS
handsets, the rangers had virtually no experience in using the devices. Staff of
the Vashlovani National Park proved to the exception. Vashlovani is
institutionally one of the most developed protected areas anywhere in Georgia.
In addition NACRES in close cooperation with its management and active
involvement of its staff members has been conducting various research projects
and activities on this protected areas for many years, which has included the
use of radio-tracking and photo-trapping techniques. Consequently, rangers from
the Vashlovani National Park were already familiar with many of the topics to be
covered in the field training.
With few exceptions practically all participants of the field training
sessions from all four protected areas showed a remarkable degree of motivation
and ability to learn more about data collection and to become familiar with new
technologies. Despite differences in individual capabilities, most participants
quickly learned how to make use of a GPS on a general user level. They were able
to learn some of the most useful functions and operations that were relevant to
their everyday work. For example, the rangers learned: marking a point and
recording it in a GPS, transferring a location onto map, search for previously
recorded waypoints and navigation to a selected one, taking a location from a
map and entering it into GPS for subsequent navigation. Rangers were quite
amused to play a treasure hunting game using GPS - it proved a useful practice
for acquiring skills of using this device. The game basically involved the
following: one of the trainers would hide “treasure”, a bottle of beer or pack
of cigarettes and take GPS readings for the site on a piece of paper. Each
participant was given one set of coordinates and they had to enter it into a GPS
and follow up by going out in search of the hidden treasure. Every participant
successfully navigated to the targeted site and found the concealed “treasure”.
|